+7 (495) 987 43 74 (ext. 33-04)
Join us -          
Рус   |   Eng

Journal archive

№4(52) July-august 2015 year

Content:

Entrepreneurship theory

This article discusses the reasons for the slow pace of implementation of high-tech innovation by traditional industries enterprises. Authors consider the lack of awareness of the level of technological innovation as the main reasons for the slow implementation and usage of innovation by representatives of traditional industries. 
Authors adapt the well-known model of Aghion «distance to the frontier» so, that it can be applicable to inter-sectoral and inter-firm level of decision-making. The resulting model allows in each case (industry or firm) to answer the question: what is more effectively — to develop our own innovation or to implement and use previously developed innovations. 
The closer a company (or industry) is to the «frontier» of technological development, the more benefits it will receive from the development of its own innovation. The greater the distance to the technology “frontier”, the greater the innovation potential of the company (or industry), and the more effective will be implementation and use of previously developed innovations.

Author: V. Zhokhova

In recent studies of business and management, social entrepreneurship is one of the most actively studied areas. The following article provides analysis of major studies of social entrepreneurship concepts published in scientific magazines from 1998 up to 2014. The research also provides features of social organization and characteristics of social entrepreneur. The concept of social entrepreneurship still poorly studied. That is proved by variety of theoretical studies and by limited number of empirical researches in this area. The main factor that differs social entrepreneurship from traditional one is the ability of entrepreneurs to use special methods. Social entrepreneurship can be defined as; a model of political transformation, process of activity, entrepreneurial behavior of the social initiatives’ beginner who creates social organization and who is interested in tangible results. The research of social entrepreneur defined his ability to find the possibilities in entrepreneurial activities and use resources for achieving social mission and fixing social problems. This ability can be aimed to self-realization of an individual, organization of charity, social help, or result orientated. The main types of social entrepreneur organizations are traditional noncommercial organizations, noncommercial social-oriented firms, hybrid organizations, commercial social-oriented firms. The research shows that Russian practice does not have commercial and noncommercial social-orientated firms and hybrid organizations. As the result, research provides specific major concepts of social entrepreneurship, defined characteristics and nuances of social entrepreneurship, and analysis of social entrepreneurs’ types and intentions.

Antitrust regulation

Author: A. Kovalev

In article legal grounds of carrying out selection of persons for rendering services are analysed on movement and (or) storage of the detained vehicles. The judicial is considered and administrative practice on consideration of questions of free selection of persons for rendering services for movement and (or) storage of the detained vehicles for lack of ensuring equal access for other participants of the market. Practice of certain subjects of the Russian Federation on selection of persons for rendering services for movement and (or) storage of the detained vehicles is investigated, the main approaches, similarities and distinctions between them are noted, and also examples of concrete provisions of such orders containing requirements of discrimination (anticompetitive) character which can bring are allocated to restriction, elimination, prevention of the competition among the persons having intention and possibility of participation in these selections. 
The author formulated prerequisites and the main approaches to expansion of a circle of people which could participate in selections on the right of movement and (or) storage of the detained vehicles, and also to possibility of realization of the right of the driver — the buyer (consumer) “constrainedly“ on a choice of the tow pounds. 
Examples of actions of authorities which not only can lead to violations of the antitrust law are given, but also directly led to such violations.

Author: I. Knyazeva

The author studied violations of the antimonopoly law on the gas sector market. FAS has an increased focus on this market; however, the number of violations keeps going up, constituting a significant share of violations at the industry level. On the gas market in 2014 accounted for 6.7% of all applications, 3.5% of cases and 2.5% of issued regulations. The paper outlines the results of the author’s analysis of violations on the gas market by types and Clauses — abuse of dominant position (96.3% of all breaches in this market), agreements and unfair competition.
The increase in cases of FAS in the statements of individuals or in respect of individuals tends to increase, which, according to the author, is a negative trend. The circle of subjects of legal relations is shifted from the control of the illegal activities in the area of restrictive practices toward consumer protection. Only in the last six years the percentage of physical the applicants amounted to 45.7% and the number of the violations against physical and legal persons are almost equal (respectively to 48.6 and 51.4%). In General, this diagnose the situation on the gas market, institutional, technological, tariff and other problems, the solution of which consumers can’t find in the local governments or other authorities, and I appeal to the Antimonopoly authority.
The features of the specifics of processing cases by the antimonopoly authority, the structure of violations and comparative analysis by Clauses of violation. Based on statistical data on violations committed in 2007 – 2014, content-analysis of FAS official web-site as well as the protocols of the sessions of the Expert Council on developing competition on the gas market, the author highlights the key aspects and problem areas for gas market performance in terms of compliance with the competition law.
Systematized the most frequently repeated reasons and painted a portrait of the typical violations. The greatest number of problems occur in the markets associated with the distribution of gas through networks of low and medium pressure and supply to final customers.

Author: A. Shastitko

This article brings out and summarizes approaches to definition of market product boundaries for the purpose of antitrust law enforcement in accordance with the relationship between the main and derivative products. Following factors are discussed: price of the derivate product in absolute terms and in comparison with the main product price; probability of the derivative product sale to consumer under period of the main product use; the main product buyers structure; information on durables post-sale service conditions availability. It is shown applicability of transaction cost economics approach to discuss issues relating antitrust and contracting using such transaction features as bounded rationality, opportunistic behavior and assets specificity. The reasons to mitigate the mode of antitrust enforcement in aftermarkets are exposed: research and development expenditures, reputation effects for the main product producer who controls aftermarket, increasing return to scale in aftermarket.,The article provides the assessment of the results of Russian antimonopoly policy and competition advocacy in related markets characterized by «main product-derivative product» relationship. Special attention is devoted to compliance practices of manufacturers and dealers in auto industry from the perspective of competition support in aftermarkets. The article offers policy implications for the antitrust law enforcement in aftermarkets in Russia.

Author: S. Golovanova

Non-competitive behavior of auction participants is a serious problem, leading to losses of economic efficiency of projects where the mechanism is used. Such violations are quite common in Russia and are traditionally in the focus of attention of antitrust authority. In practice, the prosecution of competition-restricting agreements is often problematic, given the diversity of their forms and underdeveloped standards of proof. This, in turn, weakens the deterrent effect of antitrust prohibitions. 
The purpose of the article is to assess the role of the parameters of the auctions and standards of proof applied in the Russian antitrust investigations which they play in opposition to the conclusion of the competition-restricting agreements in competitive bidding. To achieve this goal in this study we generalize the results of theoretical studies devoted to the analysis of collusion in auctions. We also analyze the most common violations of the antitrust law by auction participants found in the Russian practice. The case study method is used to identify the parameters of the auctions, facilitating entering into competition-restricting agreements, as well as problematic issues related to attracting bidders to justice for anti-competitive behaviour.

Competitiveness of the territories

Within the publication relevance of carrying out the analysis of competitiveness of services of the enterprises of restaurant and leisure-entertaining business is defined. The main changes of the Russian market of restaurant and leisure and entertaining services caused by social and economic features of development of the country are considered. The main tendencies of development of the market of the considered services are defined. On the basis of the analysis of various approaches to determination of competitiveness of the enterprises and services the author’s treatment of the concept «competitiveness of services» was offered. In article types of the competition, characteristic for the market of the enterprises of restaurant and leisure-entertaining business are also considered. A number of the main approaches to an assessment of competitiveness of services is presented, for each of which the main requirements are allocated. By reasoning and by means of intermediate findings of studies underline the relevance and practical importance of strategic planning, taking into account environmental factors, as well as the introduction of a set of measures aimed at improving the competitiveness of enterprises catering and leisure and entertainment business to meet the needs and goals of stakeholders.

Author: A. Lebedev

In the article the author reviews the main aspects that outline the competitiveness of the developed and the developing economies in the international market. The main indicator of competitiveness used is the Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) published annually in the «Global Competitiveness Report» by the World Economic Forum. The authors of the «Global Competitiveness Report» define a more competitive economy as one that is likely to grow faster over time. The author reviews a number of papers written by Russian-speaking researchers on similar subject. Detailed analysis of the integrative sub-indices of the GCI is followed by an attempt to articulate common key factors for competitiveness of different sub-groups of the developed and the developing economies. The author attempts to describe common features for every newly outlined sub-group. As a result of such analysis the author attempts to articulate the common factors that define the position of a certain economy in the GCI rating. The author attempts to define the position of the Russian economy in the index and the main determinant factors for its competitiveness. Global Competitiveness Report, Global Competitiveness Index, International Competitiveness, Developed Economies, Developing Economies, the Economy of Russia, innovation-driven factors of development. The author defines a separate category of economies: small resource-lacking countries. These countries have managed to develop their economies despite lack in resources and their small sizes (in terms of market and population). Israel being one of such economies deserves special attention. On the basis of modern concepts of «the knowledge economy» and the process of knowledge accumulation (being an important process to spur the competitiveness of an economy) the author analyzes Israeli experience. The analysis is focused on the activities of the Chief Scientist’s Offices that operates within the Ministry of Economy of Israel. The project initiated by the Office contributed to the growth of the innovation potential in Israel during the last decades.