List articles
|
Entrepreneurial activity as a choice of the life strategy of national research universities students
№ 1(61)
28 february 2017 year
Rubric: The issues of entrepreneurship education The author: Frolova I. |
At the stage of transformation of the socio-economic sphere of society, an important task of the modern education system is the implementation of educational programs for entrepreneurial activities.
The main actors in the implementation of such programs are national research universities, which are able to take responsibility for the formation of entrepreneurial competencies that influence the socialization and life strategies of student youth.
Continue...
|
|---|---|
|
№ 1(61)
28 february 2017 year
Rubric: The issues of entrepreneurship education The author: Nazarova U. |
The role of entrepreneurship in socio-economic life of the territory can not be overestimated. This flexible business solutions and innovative development, and solving the unemployment problem. Statistics unfortunately does not indicate the rapid growth of entrepreneurship in our country. It is difficult to say that the region is more valuable: a rich supply of natural resources or development of entrepreneurial potential. In this case, if the importance of the region for investment and resource base reads quite a lot, about the development of the entrepreneurial capacity to think much less common. Thus, we will try to find a solution to the problem by creating a system for developing entrepreneurial capacity in the region through the development of a modernization business space.
Continue...
|
|
№ 1(61)
28 february 2017 year
Rubric: The issues of entrepreneurship education Authors: Engel J., Rossi B., Schindehutte M., Smilor R. |
What I've Learned About Teaching Entrepreneurship: Perspectives of Five Master Educators Continue... |
|
№ 1(61)
28 february 2017 year
Rubric: The issues of entrepreneurship education Authors: Solomon G., Matthews C. |
The curricular confusion between entrepreneurship education and small business management: a qualitative analysis1. The purpose of this chapter is to identify the common curricular practice of mixing and mismatching concepts and theories of small business and entrepreneurship based on the assumption that small business and entrepreneurship are coterminous phenomena. The discussion of this paper revolved around the question of clarifying and articulating the differences between pedagogy and curricula for steady state growth oriented small business owners and accelerated growth or scalable venture founders. The distinctiveness and overlap between steady state and accelerated growth entrepreneurs is relevant to academia, practitioners, and policy makers. We suggest 'entrepreneurship' is the art and science of taking the risk and action to create a venture and value for multiple constituents. Furthermore, we posit that it is the 'entrepreneur' that engages in 'entrepreneurship'. Moreover, entrepreneurs can be either founders of small business ventures (steady state growth aspirant) or scalable ventures (accelerated growth aspirant). Finally, while these two entrepreneurship paths (steady state versus accelerated growth) are divergent in nature they can be convergent (steady state growth morphs into a scalable accelerated venture and vice-versa), and they have different pedagogical and curricular needs.
Continue...
|
|
The basic idea of using comparable markets for antitrust analysis is discussed. The structural
alternatives of the method are presented, including the «before-and-after», «yardstick» and «benchmark
» variations, as well as a synthetic method, combining traits of the first three. A link is established
between the requirements for the applied method of analyzing comparable markets, the criteria
used to determine them and the research objectives — establishing the fact if an excessive or
predatory price has been set and estimating the harm from an anticompetitive practice. International
practice in applying the method of comparable markets in antitrust is analyzed based on cases from
the EU, separate EU countries and the South-African Republic.
Continue...
|
|
|
A critical issue for the implementation of the comparable markets method in antitrust are the criteria
for choosing benchmarks. The paper focuses on the criteria for determining benchmark price
levels for cases involving abuse of dominance in the form of excessive or predatory pricing. We determine
the set of the most important criteria for choosing benchmark prices (such as geographical
and climate conditions, standard terms of contracts, macroeconomic environment, particularities
of market structures etc.) and show how the significance of specific criteria depends on the implemented
form of the method and the characteristics of particular markets. The choice of criteria also
introduces certain limitations on interpreting the results of comparable markets analysis, however,
it is possible to soften these limitations by using additional approximations, assumptions and additional
calculations.
Continue...
|
